As the major media companies close the books on 2025, the streaming picture is clearer than it has been in years. Subscriber scale has largely stabilized, pricing strategies are easier to compare, and profitability has become the defining separator between leaders and laggards.
What follows is a straightforward look at where the major streaming services stand across three metrics that matter most: subscribers, revenue per user, and profits.
Subscribers: The Hierarchy Is Set
Netflix remains the largest streaming service in the world, with more than 290 million global subscribers, based on its last disclosed figures. While the company no longer reports quarterly subscriber totals, its scale advantage remains unmatched.
Disney+ holds the clear second-place position with roughly 120 million subscribers globally. Hulu follows with a smaller but stable base, while Peacock and Paramount+ remain meaningfully behind the leaders.
At this point, subscriber positioning has settled into tiers:
- Netflix: Global scale leader
- Disney+: Strong second, supported by franchise depth
- Hulu, Peacock, Paramount+: Mid-tier services fighting for retention rather than breakout growth
What matters now isn’t quarterly subscriber swings, but which services have reached sustainable scale and which haven’t.
Revenue Per User: Where Strategy Shows Up in the Numbers
Average revenue per user tells a much cleaner story when the numbers are laid out simply.
- Netflix: ~$17.26 ARPU
- Hulu: ~$12.20
- Warner Bros. Discovery: ~$10.40
- Peacock: ~$10.00
- Disney+: ~$8.09
- ESPN+: ~$6.40
Netflix’s lead here is significant, not marginal. It earns roughly $5 more per user than Hulu and more than double ESPN+. That gap is the result of sustained price increases, tier discipline, and a growing mix of ad-supported and premium subscribers.
Disney’s services, by contrast, prioritize bundling and reach. That approach supports engagement and ecosystem value, but it caps near-term revenue per user compared with peers willing to push pricing harder.
Profits: The Metric That Changes the Conversation
Quarterly profit results are where the streaming hierarchy becomes unmistakable.
- Netflix: ~$2.5 billion in quarterly profit
- Disney+ and Hulu combined: ~$352 million
- Warner Bros. Discovery streaming: ~$345 million
- Paramount streaming: ~$340 million
- Peacock: -$217 million loss
Netflix is operating at a different economic scale. Its quarterly profit alone exceeds the combined streaming profits of its nearest competitors.
Disney, Warner Bros. Discovery, and Paramount are all posting modest but meaningful profits from their streaming businesses. Peacock stands apart as the only major service still operating at a loss, even as that loss narrows.
Scale and ARPU matter, but cost control and content discipline are what ultimately determine profitability.
What the Numbers Say Heading Into 2026
Looking across these metrics together, three conclusions stand out.
- Subscriber leadership is largely locked in. No major service is positioned to materially disrupt Netflix’s scale advantage in the near term.
- Monetization strategy matters more than raw reach. Services with lower ARPU face a steeper climb to meaningful profitability, regardless of subscriber totals.
- Profitability is no longer theoretical. Several services are proving that streaming can generate real earnings, but only with disciplined spending and clear pricing frameworks.
The Streaming Wars Take
The results at year-end 2025 show that streaming winners aren’t defined by growth headlines, but by their ability to convert scale into predictable revenue and profits.
Netflix has set the benchmark across all three dimensions: subscriber scale, revenue per user, and profitability. Its lead is not the result of short-term tactics, but of sustained pricing discipline, cost control, and a clear willingness to optimize for earnings rather than optics.
The rest of the field is competing on far narrower margins. Disney, Warner Bros. Discovery, and Paramount have demonstrated that profitability is achievable, but only with tighter execution and fewer strategic missteps. Peacock’s continued losses highlight how unforgiving the model remains for services that lack either scale or monetization leverage.
Streaming’s no longer about proving demand. It’s about running a business that turns an established audience into durable revenue and profits, quarter after quarter.
The Streaming Wars is intentionally ad-free
We don’t run display ads. Not because we can’t, but because we don’t believe in them.
They interrupt the reading experience. They cheapen the work. And they burn advertisers’ money on impressions nobody actually wants.
So we chose a different model.
We say the things people in this industry are already thinking but don’t say out loud. We connect the dots beyond the headline and focus on explaining why things matter to the people working in this business.
If you believe industry coverage can exist without clutter and interruption, you can support it here → SUPPORT TSW.
Support is optional. But it directly funds research and continued coverage — and helps prove this model can work.
Support TSW →
