Film and TV production is leaving Los Angeles at a pace that has turned a long-running industry concern into a direct economic threat. Studios and streaming services are making fewer shows, moving more shoots to cheaper markets and using tax incentives as a core part of production financing. The result is hitting Los Angeles hard: the county’s motion picture workforce fell from roughly 142,000 jobs in 2022 to about 100,000 by the end of 2024, wiping out about 42,000 jobs in two years.
That decline reflects a larger reset in how production decisions get made. L.A. still has the deepest creative workforce in the business, but studios now need lower costs, faster execution and stronger incentive packages. Other states and countries have spent years building those advantages. They’re no longer chasing overflow work. They’re winning the projects that used to default to Southern California.
Productions Are Leaving Because the Economics No Longer Protect L.A.
Los Angeles built its production dominance on density. Crews, vendors, stages, post houses, agencies, executives and creative talent all sit inside one market. That concentration still matters, and it remains difficult to replicate.
The premium attached to L.A. has become harder to defend.
Labor costs more. Locations cost more. Housing costs more. Permitting takes longer. Local restrictions can turn basic production needs into schedule risk. In a tighter content market, every delay and every cost overrun moves directly into the greenlight conversation.
The streaming correction accelerated the shift. During the boom, services needed volume and Wall Street rewarded subscriber growth. After 2022, the mandate changed. Buyers cut spend, reduced series orders, killed marginal projects and pushed producers to deliver lower budgets with greater certainty.
That changed location selection. Production geography now functions like financing. If Vancouver, London, Atlanta, Winnipeg or Australia can cut effective costs by 20% to 30%, staying in L.A. needs a hard budgetary defense.
Where the Work Is Going
The work is moving to markets that offer three things L.A. struggles to combine: lower net costs, mature crews and fewer operational surprises.
The U.K. Is Capturing High-End Franchise Work
The U.K. has become one of Hollywood’s strongest global production alternatives because it combines aggressive incentives with serious infrastructure. London offers soundstage capacity, experienced crews, VFX depth and proximity to European talent.
That’s why major projects can move there without feeling like compromises. The new Avengers films being made in London show how far the market has climbed. The U.K. now competes for premium franchise work, not overflow.
Its incentive structure also gives producers a powerful financial argument. The country’s program can cover a broad base of qualifying costs, and producers say its treatment of compensation structures makes it especially difficult for California to match.
Canada Keeps Winning Because It’s Predictable
Canada remains the most practical North American release valve for U.S. production. Vancouver, Toronto and Winnipeg offer experienced crews, stable production systems and stacked incentives.
The federal 16% labor credit sits on top of provincial programs. Manitoba’s 30% incentive, layered with federal support, helps explain why the Little House on the Prairie revival shot in Winnipeg. British Columbia’s infrastructure helps explain why the Scrubs reboot can film there.
Canada’s advantage isn’t only money. It’s repeatable. Producers know the crews, the vendors, the rules and the savings. That certainty matters when studios are asking every showrunner and line producer to bring budgets down.
Georgia Built an Industrial Production Base
Georgia’s rise reflects a long-term strategy, not a short-term discount. Atlanta built crew depth, stages, vendor networks and political consistency around its incentive program.
The key value is certainty. Producers don’t want to build a budget around a credit they may not receive. Georgia’s structure gives studios a clearer line of sight than capped programs that force projects to compete for allocation.
That’s how a subsidy market becomes a production market. Once enough work moves in, crews stay, vendors expand and the location becomes easier to use on the next project.
Australia Is Pulling Bigger Global Shoots
Australia is gaining from larger incentive support, strong locations and post-production capabilities. Spaceballs 2 shooting there fits the pattern: projects with enough scale can absorb travel and relocation costs when the rebate meaningfully improves the budget.
Australia also benefits from VFX and post infrastructure, which matters as studios look for full-service jurisdictions. A location that can support principal photography, post and digital work gets more valuable in a cost-controlled market.
New Jersey and Other States Are Playing the Long Game
New Jersey matters because it’s pairing incentives with infrastructure. Netflix’s Fort Monmouth studio plan shows how states are moving beyond one-off tax credits and trying to anchor permanent production capacity.
That’s the larger threat to L.A. States and countries are building ecosystems designed around Hollywood’s pain points. They’re offering money, space, political support and simplified execution.
California’s Incentive Expansion Helps, But the Operating Model Still Needs Work
California has expanded its film and TV tax credit program, and that matters. A larger state credit can bring some productions back and keep others from leaving.
The challenge is execution. A project can receive a meaningful incentive and still face local friction around permitting, locations, parking, neighborhood restrictions, fire effects and schedule coordination. Those issues shape producer behavior because they affect the day-to-day reality of making a show.
Studios remember which markets have protected schedules. Line producers remember where they had to spend political capital before cameras rolled. Vendors remember where work became consistent enough to justify hiring and expansion.
California’s challenge is broader than matching Georgia, Canada or the U.K. on credits. It has to make filming easier.
The Job Losses Show the Ecosystem Is Already Taking Damage
The loss of roughly 42,000 L.A. motion picture jobs from 2022 to 2024 shows the decline has moved beyond studio budgeting. The pain is spreading through the vendor economy.
Florists, restaurants, drivers, caterers, prop houses, rental companies, post vendors and local small businesses all rely on steady production volume. When series orders fall and shoots leave, those businesses lose recurring demand.
That’s why comparisons to Detroit keep surfacing. The analogy can be overplayed, but the anxiety is real. A production ecosystem weakens gradually, then suddenly. Crews relocate. Vendors close. Restaurants lose regulars. Younger workers stop entering the pipeline. Once that happens, subsidies have to buy back capacity that already disappeared.
A Federal Credit Would Change the U.S. Competitive Position
Sen. Adam Schiff’s proposed federal labor credit aims to solve the problem at the national level. A 15% labor credit would bring the U.S. closer to Canada’s federal support, while the Motion Picture Association has pushed for 20% with bonuses for disaster zones and enterprise areas.
That matters because runaway production has become an international competition. The U.K., Canada and Australia treat screen production as industrial policy. They’re using incentives to capture jobs, infrastructure spending and long-term production relationships.
A federal credit would give every U.S. production market a stronger baseline. California would still need to fix local friction, but national support would help keep projects from leaving the country entirely.
The Streaming Wars Take
Productions are leaving Los Angeles because buyers have become more cost disciplined and rival markets have become more capable. The old L.A. advantage was concentration. The new production equation rewards cost certainty, incentive depth, regulatory simplicity and crew availability.
The work is going to the U.K., Canada, Georgia, Australia, New Jersey and other markets that have turned production incentives into operating systems. They’re selling more than rebates. They’re selling fewer surprises.
California’s expanded incentive program is a serious defensive move. The next move has to target friction. Faster permits, clearer location rules, better coordination across local agencies, stronger post-production support and a federal labor credit would give L.A. a more credible response.
L.A. can’t rebuild production volume by relying on prestige, history or emergency intervention for high-profile shoots. It has to make the everyday production experience easier, cheaper and more predictable.
Hollywood’s headquarters function may remain in Los Angeles. The production work underneath it is now fully contestable.
The Streaming Wars is intentionally ad-free
We don’t run display ads. Not because we can’t, but because we don’t believe in them.
They interrupt the reading experience. They cheapen the work. And they burn advertisers’ money on impressions nobody actually wants.
So we chose a different model.
We say the things people in this industry are already thinking but don’t say out loud. We connect the dots beyond the headline and focus on explaining why things matter to the people working in this business.
If you believe industry coverage can exist without clutter and interruption, you can support it here → SUPPORT TSW.
Support is optional. But it directly funds research and continued coverage — and helps prove this model can work.
Support TSW →
