Representative Kat Cammack (R-FL) just introduced a new bill aimed at cracking open Apple’s App Store. It’s called the App Store Freedom Act, and it promises to bring “competition” and “consumer choice” to the mobile marketplace by mandating third-party app stores, alternative payment systems, and the right to delete all those pre-installed apps no one asked for.
Sounds great, right? Sure—if you live in a world where press releases change laws and Congress gets things done.
Here, in reality, this bill is going nowhere.
It’s not that the ideas are bad. They’re not. They’re just late. Europe already forced Apple to open the gates. U.S. courts are already calling out the company’s anti-competitive tricks. And the DOJ has launched an actual antitrust lawsuit with real stakes. Compared to that, this bill is political cosplay. An empty flex that won’t sniff a floor vote, let alone the president’s desk.
Cammack gets the headlines. Apple gets to ignore them. Everyone goes home.
Meanwhile, in the real arena—the courtroom—Apple just got scorched by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who referred the company to federal prosecutors for contempt. That’s not symbolic. That’s not a soundbite. That’s a legal grenade tossed straight into the App Store’s revenue bunker.
So let’s not pretend the App Store Freedom Act is anything more than what it is: a convenient stage prop. It lets a lawmaker look like she’s taking on Big Tech with zero risk of actually disrupting the status quo. It’s the legislative version of shaking your fist at the Death Star—after the rebels have already blown it up.
If this were 2021, maybe this bill would’ve mattered. Today, it’s a rerun. The market’s already shifting under Apple’s feet, with or without Congress. Platform commissions are under siege. The walls of Apple’s ecosystem are showing cracks. Developers smell blood. And enforcement—the real kind—is finally kicking in.
We don’t need more proposals. We need more prosecutions.
Because here’s the playbook Apple and others have followed for years: stall in court, lobby in Washington, and gamble that lawmakers will move slower than regulators. That bet’s getting riskier by the day.
So, while Congress crafts another doomed tech bill, the DOJ is actually doing the work. One has teeth. The other has talking points.
The Take
This story isn’t about whether Florida can rein in Apple—it’s about how meaningless political theater has become in the face of real regulatory momentum. While lawmakers make noise, the courts are rewriting the rules. For media and streaming execs, that means the walled gardens are starting to buckle—and if you’re still structuring your distribution strategy around old platform economics, you’re gambling on a model that’s running out of legal rope.
The Streaming Wars is intentionally ad-free
We don’t run display ads. Not because we can’t, but because we don’t believe in them.
They interrupt the reading experience. They cheapen the work. And they burn advertisers’ money on impressions nobody actually wants.
So we chose a different model.
We say the things people in this industry are already thinking but don’t say out loud. We connect the dots beyond the headline and focus on explaining why things matter to the people working in this business.
If you believe industry coverage can exist without clutter and interruption, you can support it here → SUPPORT TSW.
Support is optional. But it directly funds research and continued coverage — and helps prove this model can work.
Support TSW →
