Before Netflix became synonymous with streaming and before YouTube dominated user-generated video, Joost emerged as a pioneer with a bold promise, to deliver high-quality television over the internet using peer-to-peer (P2P) technology. Launched in 2007 by Niklas Zennström and Janus Friis, the creators of Skype and Kazaa, Joost positioned itself as the future of TV, free, ad-supported, and full of professionally licensed content. With deep pockets and big-name content deals in hand, it was poised to disrupt the entire television landscape.
The Venice Project
Joost began development in 2006 under the codename “The Venice Project.” Zennström and Friis assembled a global team of more than 150 developers in cities like New York, London, Leiden, and Toulouse. Their goal was to replicate the peer-to-peer efficiency of Skype for video distribution. Joost’s initial platform was built on Mozilla’s XULRunner and incorporated technologies from Joltid, the same company that had built the P2P core for Skype. It used the CoreAVC H.264 video decoder and a distributed mesh of users to reduce reliance on centralized servers.
Unlike streaming services that serve content from data centers, Joost used each viewer’s computer to help distribute the stream to others. The model reduced server load and was expected to scale globally with lower costs. Overlays, widgets, and chat features made the experience interactive, turning the viewer’s PC into a social and dynamic entertainment hub.
Big Names, Bigger Expectations
Joost’s launch was met with excitement. The platform secured licensing deals with major media entities including Warner Music, MTV Networks, BET, Paramount Pictures, CBS, Endemol, Fremantle Media, RDF Media, and the NHL. Content spanned everything from music videos and game replays to Bollywood films via Eros International. By mid-2007, Joost had more than one million beta testers.
Advertisers were eager too. Sony Pictures, Sprite, and BMW signed up to reach young, tech-savvy viewers through injected ads, overlays, and clickable pop-ups. Joost was heralded as a legal, monetized alternative to YouTube, especially after Viacom signed a landmark agreement with Joost shortly after demanding the takedown of 100,000 clips from YouTube.
The UX Shift and Business Repositioning
Initially available via a downloadable desktop player, Joost transitioned to a Flash-based web player in late 2008 to increase accessibility. The platform also experimented with console-friendly interfaces, launching a version optimized for the PlayStation 3’s browser. Joost’s “TV 2.0” vision included second-screen features, profile personalization, and a Widget API to allow developers to build on the platform.
Despite the innovation, Joost faced friction. Licensing content globally proved difficult, with much of its programming geoblocked to the United States. The user experience lagged behind competitors, with buffering and performance issues undermining its promise of TV-quality video.
From Boom to Bust
Joost burned through capital quickly. Though it raised 45 million dollars from Sequoia Capital, Index Ventures, CBS, and others, user growth and engagement failed to meet expectations. Content partners were hesitant to give Joost their best titles, preferring to keep control via their own platforms or explore newer options like Hulu.
In July 2009, then-CEO Mike Volpi stepped down following layoffs. His successor, Matt Zelesko, attempted to pivot Joost into a white-label video platform. But it was too late. In December 2008, Joost had already abandoned its desktop application, and in 2009, its UK subsidiary was liquidated.
Later that year, Adconion Media Group acquired most of Joost’s assets and folded them into its video ad business. The website was eventually shut down in 2012. Joost was rebranded under Smartclip, marking the quiet end of a once-hyped disruptor.
The Legacy of Joost
Joost is a textbook example of a visionary product ahead of its time, but undermined by execution and market readiness. While it failed to become the next TV, it anticipated many trends that are now commonplace, from over-the-top distribution and profile-based recommendations to ad-supported video and second-screen interactivity.
Its failure also reflected a broader tension in early internet video. Licensing complexities, inconsistent quality, and the rapid rise of platforms like YouTube and Netflix left little room for a peer-to-peer hybrid like Joost to find footing.
Still, Joost’s ambition helped shape early conversations around internet TV. It forced media companies to reckon with the future of distribution and inspired the next wave of streaming services to prioritize simplicity, speed, and scale.
Looking Back, Moving Forward
Joost was not just another failed startup. It was a big bet on a future that arrived faster than its architecture could handle. While the service is long gone, its lessons live on in every seamless, buffering-free stream we now take for granted.
The Streaming Wars is intentionally ad-free
We don’t run display ads. Not because we can’t, but because we don’t believe in them.
They interrupt the reading experience. They cheapen the work. And they burn advertisers’ money on impressions nobody actually wants.
So we chose a different model.
We say the things people in this industry are already thinking but don’t say out loud. We connect the dots beyond the headline and focus on explaining why things matter to the people working in this business.
If you believe industry coverage can exist without clutter and interruption, you can support it here → SUPPORT TSW.
Support is optional. But it directly funds research and continued coverage — and helps prove this model can work.
Support TSW →
