Website Logo
  • News
  • Insights
  • Columns
    • Ask Skip
    • Basics of Streaming
    • Exec Briefing
    • From The Archives
    • Insiders Circle
  • Directory
  • Guides
    • TSW Guide to Metadata
    • TSW Guide to AI & The Modern Media Workflow
    • TSW Guide to the Future of Media Jobs
  • For Companies
  • Support TSW
  • News
  • Insights
  • Columns
    • Ask Skip
    • Basics of Streaming
    • Exec Briefing
    • From The Archives
    • Insiders Circle
  • Directory
  • Guides
    • TSW Guide to Metadata
    • TSW Guide to AI & The Modern Media Workflow
    • TSW Guide to the Future of Media Jobs
  • For Companies
  • Support TSW
Subscribe

Netflix’s September Exits Put Catalog Rights Back Into Play

Kirby Grines
September 29, 2026
in Programming, Advertising, Business, FAST, Insights, Subscriptions
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0
Netflix’s September Exits Put Catalog Rights Back Into Play

Netflix is losing a sizable batch of licensed movies and shows in September, including Girlfriends, Nashville, Spartacus, Lopez vs. Lopez, Anatomy of a Fall, and the Creed trilogy.

When those windows end, the rights owner has another call to make: renew with Netflix, sell another SVOD window, move into AVOD or FAST, split the rights by territory, bring the title onto an owned service, or leave it off streaming for a while.

A Netflix departure doesn’t mean the rights are sitting there waiting for the next check. Another contract may already cover them, a new deal may be underway, or the owner may want to hold the title back.

Six Years on Netflix Is Different From One

Netflix’s September departures came out of very different deals.

Girlfriends arrived in September 2020 and stayed for roughly six years. Its original agreement was expected to expire in 2023, but Netflix renewed it for another three years.

Heels came in under a two-year deal beginning in September 2024.

Nashville got a one-year Netflix run beginning in 2025. Spartacus returned under a one-year agreement after having appeared on Netflix in earlier years.

A service considering Girlfriends is looking at a show U.S. Netflix subscribers had six years to watch. A buyer looking at Nashville is dealing with a much shorter recent Netflix run. Spartacus carries yet another history because viewers have had multiple Netflix windows over time.

Current availability won’t show those differences.

A buyer needs to know where the title was, how long it stayed there, and how recently that audience had access.

Shorter Deals Put the Seller Back in the Market Faster

A one-year agreement gives the rights owner another chance to sell much sooner than a five-year deal.

During that year, another service may lose similar programming. An AVOD buyer may increase its offer. A sequel may get dated. An actor may break out. A genre that looked crowded when the deal was signed may suddenly have fewer titles available.

The buyer gets something from the longer term too: more time to promote the title, generate viewing, and keep competitors from carrying the same rights.

Term length should show up in the price. A longer agreement gives the buyer more time and blocks the seller from making the same deal elsewhere. A shorter one gives the owner another chance to take bids sooner.

Leaving Netflix Doesn’t Mean Another SVOD Is Next

A title coming off Netflix can land on another subscription service, move to Tubi or another AVOD service, feed FAST programming, return to an owned service, remain available only to rent or buy, or disappear from streaming for a while.

The gap between paid and free streaming has also gotten shorter for many movies. Reelgood analyzed 7,966 popular movies with measurable paid-to-free paths and found the median gap fell from six months for 2020 releases to 2.5 months for 2025 releases.

That gives rights owners another set of offers to compare when an SVOD window ends.

An AVOD check may beat the value of holding the title off free streaming for another six months. Another SVOD buyer may pay more for exclusivity. A FAST deal may make sense for a deep library with enough episodes to support a channel.

The Previous Window Changes the Next Check

The first AVOD service to carry a movie gives viewers something they couldn’t previously watch for free. The fourth AVOD service doesn’t.

Territory changes the calculation too. A title can spend years circulating in the U.S. while seeing far less recent streaming exposure in Canada or the U.K.

If viewers in one market have had easy access for years, the next service is buying something different from a title returning after a long absence.

The previous windows have already given different portions of the audience a chance to watch.

The Sales List Is Already Late

Licensing teams don’t have to wait for a studio to send over a 500-title package to notice that programming has left Netflix.

Departures, arrivals, catalog cuts, category changes, and periods when recognizable titles disappear from major services can all be tracked.

That doesn’t mean the rights are available. It gives the acquisitions team something specific to check:

Who controls the title?

Where else is it running?

How long was the last window?

Has it already been on AVOD?

Is it available in the U.S. but tied up somewhere else?

Did another service just lose a bunch of similar programming?

The seller can use the same information. If one buyer is adding horror while another is cutting it, the sales team has a better place to start calling.

That’s more useful than waiting for the next broad package to land in somebody’s inbox.

The Streaming Wars Take

Netflix’s September exits give rights owners another chance to run the numbers on titles that were already earning somewhere else.

Start with the last deal.

How long did the title sit on Netflix? How many viewers had access? Which countries were included? Was the title exclusive? Has it already been through AVOD? What rights come back now?

Then check the market again.

Which services are adding the category? What will another SVOD buyer pay? What will an AVOD buyer pay? Does the owner still need the title exclusive inside its own service? Are there territories that should be sold separately instead of bundled into one global agreement?

Buyers should run the same check before making an offer.

A show leaving Netflix may fill a real catalog gap. It may also be something the target audience just had six years to watch.

The price should reflect which one the buyer is getting.

The Streaming Wars is intentionally ad-free

We don’t run display ads. Not because we can’t, but because we don’t believe in them.

They interrupt the reading experience. They cheapen the work. And they burn advertisers’ money on impressions nobody actually wants.

So we chose a different model.

We say the things people in this industry are already thinking but don’t say out loud. We connect the dots beyond the headline and focus on explaining why things matter to the people working in this business.

If you believe industry coverage can exist without clutter and interruption, you can support it here → SUPPORT TSW.

Support is optional. But it directly funds research and continued coverage — and helps prove this model can work.

Support TSW →
Tags: AVODcatalog licensingcatalog rightscontent acquisitioncontent licensingCreedexclusivityFASTGirlfriendslicensed contentNashvillenetflixprogrammingReelgoodSpartacusstreaming rightsstreaming windowssvodtubiwindowing
Share220Tweet138Send

Related Posts

Ask Skip: When AI Picks What to Watch, Who Gets to Buy the Answer?

Ask Skip: When AI Picks What to Watch, Who Gets to Buy the Answer? Skip Buffering

October 7, 2026
Paramount Closes Its Warner Bros. Deal, Leaving Hollywood With Fewer Buyers and More Pressure to Play It Safe

Paramount Closes Its Warner Bros. Deal, Leaving Hollywood With Fewer Buyers and More Pressure to Play It Safe Kirby Grines

October 6, 2026
Why Retailers, Streamers and Ad Tech All Want Their Own Roku

Why Retailers, Streamers and Ad Tech All Want Their Own Roku Kirby Grines

October 6, 2026
McDonald’s Drive-Thru Ad Test Turns Post-Order Attention Into Media Inventory

McDonald’s Drive-Thru Ad Test Turns Post-Order Attention Into Media Inventory The Streaming Wars Staff

October 5, 2026
Next Post
Trump Has a Campaign. Taxpayers Are Buying the Airtime

Trump Has a Campaign. Taxpayers Are Buying the Airtime

Recent News

Ask Skip: When AI Picks What to Watch, Who Gets to Buy the Answer?

Ask Skip: When AI Picks What to Watch, Who Gets to Buy the Answer?

Skip Buffering
October 7, 2026
Messi Gave ViX a Once-in-a-Generation Acquisition Moment. Now It Has to Decide Which Customers Are Worth Owning

Messi Gave ViX a Once-in-a-Generation Acquisition Moment. Now It Has to Decide Which Customers Are Worth Owning

Kirby Grines
October 7, 2026
Paramount Closes Its Warner Bros. Deal, Leaving Hollywood With Fewer Buyers and More Pressure to Play It Safe

Paramount Closes Its Warner Bros. Deal, Leaving Hollywood With Fewer Buyers and More Pressure to Play It Safe

Kirby Grines
October 6, 2026
Why Retailers, Streamers and Ad Tech All Want Their Own Roku

Why Retailers, Streamers and Ad Tech All Want Their Own Roku

Kirby Grines
October 6, 2026
Website Logo

The Streaming Wars is an independent intelligence and B2B media platform covering streaming, distribution, advertising, and media economics. Built by operators and read by decision-makers, TSW helps companies build authority and reach the buyers shaping the industry. Ad-free. Paywall-free.

Explore

About

Find a Vendor

Have a Tip?

Contact

Podcast

For Companies

Support TSW

Join the Newsletter

Copyright © 2026 by 43Twenty.

Privacy Policy

Term of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Insights
  • Columns
    • Ask Skip
    • Basics of Streaming
    • Exec Briefing
    • From The Archives
    • Insiders Circle
  • Directory
  • Guides
    • TSW Guide to Metadata
    • TSW Guide to AI & The Modern Media Workflow
    • TSW Guide to the Future of Media Jobs
    • Streaming Analytics in the Age of AI
  • For Companies
  • Support TSW

Copyright © 2024 by 43Twenty.