We keep adding sports, podcasts, games, live events and short-form because leadership wants people opening the app more often. Are we solving a retention problem, or just turning daily active users into another vanity metric?
— SVP, Streaming Strategy
The question isn’t how often subscribers open the app. It’s what another visit is worth.
A subscription service collects the same monthly fee whether someone opens it twice or twenty times. The economics change when the extra visit improves retention, creates advertising inventory, supports a higher price, drives an upgrade or leads to another transaction.
Daily usage can do all of those things.
It can also produce a beautiful engagement dashboard while adding millions of dollars in programming, product and technology costs.
Streaming has developed a case of DAU envy.
YouTube wants daily usage. TikTok wants daily usage. Spotify wants daily usage. Google TV has a clear incentive to keep viewers inside its home-screen environment. More sessions give those businesses more opportunities to serve ads, collect signals, recommend something, sell something or route the consumer toward another transaction.
A premium streaming service can have a very different customer relationship. Someone can disappear for five days, come back for two shows over the weekend and remain perfectly happy paying every month.
That subscriber isn’t necessarily under-engaged. The service may already be getting exactly what it needs from the relationship.
Antenna put weighted average monthly churn across Premium SVOD at 4.6% in 2025. Retention remains the economic problem. Frequency is one possible tool for addressing it.
The tool gets more valuable as streaming services add ways to monetize another session.
Netflix’s ad-supported offering now reaches more than 250 million global monthly actives, and more than 80% of ad-plan members watch in a given week. Netflix nearly doubled its U.S. upfront advertising commitments this year after more than doubling them in 2025.
More viewing now produces sellable inventory alongside whatever retention value Netflix gets from the programming.
That helps explain Netflix’s push to own game night. Party games give the household another reason to turn on Netflix when nobody planned to watch a series. Live events create appointments. Video podcasts can fill the gaps between major releases.
Each format can create another session without requiring another $200 million drama.
Disney is working the same frequency problem with different inputs.
Its iHeartMedia agreement brings six video podcasts to Disney+ and Hulu, while its deal with The Overlap gives Disney+ 40 episodes of Stick to Football and 50 episodes of Stick to United with Wayne Rooney during the 2026/27 soccer season, plus commissioned episodes and exclusive content.
The Overlap gives Disney+ recurring soccer attention without requiring the underlying match rights. The matches generate a constant supply of results, injuries, transfers, managerial pressure and arguments. Personality-driven shows extend that consumption across the week.
That’s a useful frequency play because the cost structure can look very different from premium scripted programming.
If recurring programming closes the gap between expensive releases and reduces churn or produces incremental ad inventory at an attractive cost, frequency is doing a job.
Trouble starts when frequency becomes the job.
Once an organization decides it needs daily users, every product team can find another reason for someone to open the app. Add games. Add podcasts. Add clips. Add vertical video. Add live channels. Add rewards. Add shopping. Add notifications.
Each addition creates operating costs. It needs some combination of rights, product development, metadata, recommendations, merchandising, marketing, measurement and technical support.
Usage alone doesn’t justify any of it.
A feature that generates another session but doesn’t improve retention, advertising yield, customer spending or some other measurable economic outcome has created activity without creating enough value.
Hallmark+ takes the argument in another direction.
The membership combines streaming with monthly retail coupons, shopping rewards, greeting-card benefits and unlimited eCards. Hallmark+ can create subscription value outside the viewing session.
A member doesn’t have to stream Hallmark programming every night for the membership to keep earning its place in the household budget. Retail benefits and the broader relationship with the Hallmark brand can contribute to retention without generating another minute of watch time.
Trying to force that customer into the same engagement pattern as YouTube would make no economic sense.
Google has the opposite incentive.
Google TV Freeplay now includes more than 10,000 free on-demand movies and shows alongside more than 300 live channels. That inventory gives Google more programming it can surface and monetize without sending viewers into another app.
Every additional Freeplay session can produce ad inventory while giving Google control over discovery, playback and more of the viewing relationship.
Frequency has direct strategic value when you own the operating environment.
A standalone subscription service copying that engagement strategy without the same economics is copying the behavior and leaving the business model behind.
Ad tiers make this harder because another hour of viewing now has an identifiable revenue opportunity. Revenue per viewer has become more important as streaming services combine subscription fees with advertising. A recurring show can generate impressions. Live programming can create sponsorship inventory. Episodic viewing can produce repeated ad breaks across multiple sessions.
The incremental revenue still has to justify the incremental cost.
Buying $5 of engagement for $10 remains a bad deal even when everybody congratulates the engagement team.
The useful metric is the interval between moments of value.
How long can a subscriber go without getting another reason to keep paying before cancellation starts looking rational?
For a sports service, the answer may be a day or two because the schedule naturally creates appointments. A broad ad-supported service benefits from frequent viewing because sessions generate inventory. A niche SVOD service with highly differentiated programming may need only a few valuable interactions each month. A membership business such as Hallmark+ can deliver some of that value away from the screen entirely.
There’s no universal healthy frequency.
The service needs enough valuable interactions to support its own economics.
That should determine where the next programming dollar goes. Another expensive original may contribute less to retention than a weekly talk show, a live event, a game or a relatively cheap piece of recurring programming. In other cases, adding another format simply creates product complexity around an audience that was already willing to stay.
Stop asking how to make people open the app every day.
Figure out how long you can go between meaningful moments of value before cancellation starts looking rational, then spend against that interval.
If a weekly podcast closes the gap cheaply, buy it. If a game creates incremental household usage with measurable retention value, build it. If live programming produces scarce advertising inventory and gives subscribers another appointment, schedule it.
Features added to manufacture daily usage need to improve retention, revenue, or willingness to pay. When they don’t, the service is simply paying more to generate activity.
Ask Me Anything
Whether you’re fed up, fired up, or just want the truth behind the trends, send me your questions using this form. Anonymity guaranteed. Bullshit not included.
The Streaming Wars is intentionally ad-free
We don’t run display ads. Not because we can’t, but because we don’t believe in them.
They interrupt the reading experience. They cheapen the work. And they burn advertisers’ money on impressions nobody actually wants.
So we chose a different model.
We say the things people in this industry are already thinking but don’t say out loud. We connect the dots beyond the headline and focus on explaining why things matter to the people working in this business.
If you believe industry coverage can exist without clutter and interruption, you can support it here → SUPPORT TSW.
Support is optional. But it directly funds research and continued coverage — and helps prove this model can work.
Support TSW →
